1-20 of 44894
Sort by
Journal Article
Peter A Kavsak and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf057, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf057
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
Kanagavel Murugesan and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf053, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf053
Published: 02 May 2025
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 4. Within-subject BV of erythrocyte zinc protoporphyrin in participants with EPP and in healthy subjects. The figure displays median estimated personal within-subject BV (represented by squares for females and triangles for males) accompanied by their respective 95% credible intervals (depicted by hori
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 1. Same lot of commercial QC measured between September 2022 through to February 2025 on 10 Abbott ARICHTECT analyzers (n = 9589 results with overall mean = 3.0 ng/L; pooled SD = 0.9 with range of SD: 0.4 to 1.3), 1 Ortho Vitros XT 7600 analyzer (n = 1407 results with overall mean = 4.68 ng/L; SD = 0.9
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 3. Within-subject biological variation of erythrocyte metal-free protoporphyrin in participants with EPP. The figure displays median estimated personal within-subject BV (represented by squares for females and triangles for males) accompanied by their respective 95% credible intervals (depicted by hori
Journal Article
Paul Kjetel Soldal Lillemoen and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf055, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf055
Published: 02 May 2025
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 1. Comparison of threshold cycle values for RBC-bound and plasma mitochondrial cfDNA in patients with and without bloodstream infection and tuberculosis. Mitochondrial ND1 Ct values are plotted for RBC and plasma samples in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and no BSI (A) and in patient with
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 1. Individual mean values (represented by squares for females and triangles for males) and range (depicted by horizontal bars) of erythrocyte metal-free protoporphyrin in participants with EPP.
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Fig. 2. Individual mean values (represented by squares for females and triangles for males) and range (depicted by horizontal bars) of erythrocyte zinc protoporphyrin in participants with EPP (solid bars) and in healthy subjects (dashed bars).
Journal Article
Aasne K Aarsand and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf022, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf022
Published: 29 April 2025
Journal Article
Patrick M Bossuyt
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf049, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf049
Published: 28 April 2025
Journal Article
Lisa K Peterson and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf047, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf047
Published: 25 April 2025
Image
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 1. Top flowchart is of CeD serology cascade. Numbers and percentages of tested patients grouped by TTG-IgA result ranges (FLU) are shown (arms A-D). Dotted boxes (DGP-IgA) indicate nonreportable results. Numbers/percentages of patients with elevated (≥5 FLU) within each arm are also shown on the graph.
Image
Published: 24 April 2025
Fig. 2. Accuracy assessment across sites. (A), Summary of assay performance measured by recall, precision, and F1 score; (B), Summary of false-positive results across laboratories; (C), False-positive microbes reported among 16 samples; (D), The top 15 false-positive microorganisms with the highest occurren
Image
Published: 24 April 2025
Fig. 3. Repeatability assessment across laboratories. (A), Repeatability in the detection of various microorganisms across 3 replicate samples by 130 laboratories; (B), Repeatability of microbial RPM values across various microorganisms in triplicate samples. *** P < 0.001 by Kruskal–Wallis tests; (C),
Image
Published: 24 April 2025
Fig. 4. The performance of metagenomic cfDNA sequencing in distinguishing genetically similar microorganisms. Scatter plots show the RPM value of each microbe reported by laboratories in (A) sample S4 (2-fold change of theoretical ratio 0.17–0.67), (B) S5 (2-fold change of theoretical ratio 0.50–2.00), and
Journal Article
EDITOR'S CHOICE
Stephen A Bustin and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf043, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf043
Published: 24 April 2025
Journal Article
Zhenli Diao and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf044, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf044
Published: 24 April 2025
Journal Article
Andrew N Hoofnagle and Michael J MacCoss
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf046, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf046
Published: 24 April 2025
Image
Published: 24 April 2025
Fig. 1. The multicenter quality assessment study design. In this study, a total of 18 reference samples were designed and distributed to 130 laboratories. Each laboratory conducted detection using their routine metagenomic cfDNA sequencing procedures and submitted their results to the National Center for Cl