Skip to Main Content

Free Speech as Civic Structure: A Comparative Analysis of How Courts and Culture Shape the Freedom of Speech

Online ISBN:
9780197662229
Print ISBN:
9780197662199
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Book

Free Speech as Civic Structure: A Comparative Analysis of How Courts and Culture Shape the Freedom of Speech

Ronald J Krotoszynski, Jr.
Ronald J Krotoszynski, Jr.

John S. Stone Chair, Director of the Program in Constitutional Studies & Initiative for Civic Engagement, and Professor of Law

University of Alabama, USA
,
USA
Find on
Published online:
28 May 2024
Published in print:
23 July 2024
Online ISBN:
9780197662229
Print ISBN:
9780197662199
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Abstract

Free Speech as Social Structure examines and explains the very limited relevance of constitutional text to the scope and vibrancy of free speech within a particular polity. The limited relevance of text to expressive freedom holds true in the United States, where the Supreme Court largely ignores the actual text of the First Amendment, as well as in other democratic countries. In Australia, Israel, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States, all surveyed in this book, the presence of relevant constitutional text (the United States and South Africa), relevant statutory text (the United Kingdom), in addition to the complete absence of constitutional text (Australia) or lack of a formal, entrenched constitution as such (Israel) all make little to no difference to free speech rights on the ground. The strength or weakness of free speech protections depends critically on the willingness and ability of judges to police government efforts to censor speech—in conjunction with the salience of speech as a sociolegal value within the body politic. Thus, a legal system featuring independent courts, ideally vested with a power of judicial review, but that lacks a written free speech guarantee, will likely feature broader protection of the freedom of expression than a legal system with a written guarantee that lacks independent courts. Across jurisdictions, text or its absence invariably serves as, at best, a starting point for judicial efforts to protect speech. Judges, engaged in a common law enterprise, matter far more than text, and common law constitutionalism constitutes the global rule rather than the exception.

Contents
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close