Skip to Main Content

Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Foundational Articles

Online ISBN:
9780197513279
Print ISBN:
9780197513248
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Book

Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Foundational Articles

Art Hinshaw (ed.),
Art Hinshaw
(ed.)
John J. Bouma Fellow in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Clinical Professor of Law, and Director of the Lodestar Dispute Resolution Center, Arizona State University
Find on
Andrea Kupfer Schneider (ed.),
Andrea Kupfer Schneider
(ed.)
Professor of Law, Director of the Marquette University Institute for Women's Leadership, Director of the Marquette University Law School Dispute Resolution Program, Marquette University Law School
Find on
Sarah Rudolph Cole (ed.)
Sarah Rudolph Cole
(ed.)
Michael E. Moritz Chair in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University
Find on
Published online:
17 June 2021
Published in print:
1 July 2021
Online ISBN:
9780197513279
Print ISBN:
9780197513248
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Abstract

As a serious field of academic study for approximately forty years, Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Foundational Articles constitutes both a celebration of the dispute resolution field’s most influential commentaries in its first few decades and a reflection of what makes these pieces so important. In this book, the editors have identified sixteen foundational writings published before the year 2000. They consist of four pieces from each of the field’s primary subfields—negotiation, mediation, and arbitration—as well as four pieces that are more public policy focused and do not neatly fit in one of those three categories. In each section, the works appear in chronological order, and each has four commenters who are answering the question: Why is this work a foundational piece in the dispute resolution field? The purpose in asking this simple question is fourfold: to hail the field’s foundational generation and their work, to bring a fresh look at these articles, to engage the articles’ original authors where possible, and to challenge the articles with the benefit of hindsight. And, where possible, we give authors of the original pieces the opportunity either to reflect on the piece itself or to respond to the other commenters.

Contents
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close