-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Islam Omar, Abby Townsend, Oliver Hadfield, Moataz Khogali, Jeremy Wilson, Conor Magee, SP7.11 Outcomes of Elective and Emergency Surgical Repair of Incisional Hernia - A Comparative Observational Study, British Journal of Surgery, Volume 110, Issue Supplement_6, September 2023, znad241.085, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad241.085
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. This study aims to describe and compare the outcomes of IH's elective and emergency surgical repair.
A single-centre comparative retrospective study including all patients who had surgical repair of IH. The patients were divided into Group I (Emergency) and Group II (Elective). A comparison was made between the two groups.
262 patients were identified with a mean age of 61.8 SD±14.2 years, and 152 (58%) were females. More than 58% had at least one comorbidity. 169 (64.5%) had elective, and 93 (35.5%) had emergency repair. Patients undergoing emergency repair of IH were significantly older and had higher BM, p= 0.031 and 0.002, respectively.
The overall complication rate in the full cohort was 46.2%, and the significant complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III and IV) was 9.54%. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 6 (2.3%) and 7 (2.68%), respectively.
In the emergency group, the complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than in the elective group, p= <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively. The emergency group had a significantly longer hospital stay, and more of them needed a higher level of care, p= <0.001 each.
Overall, 42 (16.1%) developed wound complications, 25 (9.6%) patients had a recurrence, and 41 (15.71%) had 90-day readmissions without significant differences between the two groups.
IH is associated with medical comorbidity and high BMI. Emergency repair of IH is associated with higher complication rates and mortality compared to elective repair.