Abstract

Aims

Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. This study aims to describe and compare the outcomes of IH's elective and emergency surgical repair.

Methods

A single-centre comparative retrospective study including all patients who had surgical repair of IH. The patients were divided into Group I (Emergency) and Group II (Elective). A comparison was made between the two groups.

Results

262 patients were identified with a mean age of 61.8 SD±14.2 years, and 152 (58%) were females. More than 58% had at least one comorbidity. 169 (64.5%) had elective, and 93 (35.5%) had emergency repair. Patients undergoing emergency repair of IH were significantly older and had higher BM, p= 0.031 and 0.002, respectively.

The overall complication rate in the full cohort was 46.2%, and the significant complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III and IV) was 9.54%. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 6 (2.3%) and 7 (2.68%), respectively.

In the emergency group, the complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than in the elective group, p= <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively. The emergency group had a significantly longer hospital stay, and more of them needed a higher level of care, p= <0.001 each.

Overall, 42 (16.1%) developed wound complications, 25 (9.6%) patients had a recurrence, and 41 (15.71%) had 90-day readmissions without significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

IH is associated with medical comorbidity and high BMI. Emergency repair of IH is associated with higher complication rates and mortality compared to elective repair.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)