Abstract

Background

Patients triaged as routine, discharged home from Intermediate Care Units (ICUs) in East Sussex wait 4 weeks until rehabilitation continues by the Community Therapy Team (CTT).

Introduction

NHS England (2023a) and NHS England (2023b) call for minimal delays, effective coordination processes and sharing of information for timely rehabilitation in intermediate care settings. Local patient feedback indicated poor patient satisfaction and increased clinicians’ anxiety regarding risk of deterioration due to long waits (Lewis A., Harding k., Snowdon D., BMC Health Service Research, 2018 18(1) 869).

Aim

To improve average wait times for routine ICU patients’ discharge, for ongoing community therapy input, to within 1 week by July 2024, while maintaining patient safety and improving patient satisfaction.

Method

Quality improvement methodology, using stakeholder engagement was used to determine the cause for long wait times for home therapy. PDSA cycles were engaged to determine if improvements could be made without a loss of quality of care, or impacting patient safety, while improving patient experience. These involved formal communication channels between teams and using a therapy assistant for an initial home assessment where full assessment had already been undertaken by registered therapists. Patient satisfaction surveys were undertaken to understand the experience of transition home.

Results

Baseline data indicated that waiting time for home therapy varied between 18–59 days, from discharge. After the initial PDSA cycle, waiting time reduced to between 4–10 days, and after the second cycle waits reduced further to between 3–7 days. Patients’ satisfaction improved significantly with shorter waiting times for therapy once home.

Conclusion

Therapy assistant initial visits at home reduced waiting times to within a week, and patients’ satisfaction improved with shorter waiting times. Patient safety was not compromised as there were clear protocols for appropriate escalations for unregistered staff.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.