Figure 6
The variation in splitting measurement results (φapp and δtapp) with the BAZ by different methods for two-layer anisotropic models, with the occurrence of horizontal component misalignment (θ0= 20°). Measurements by the traditional methods, SC–ST (diamonds), RC–ST (open circles) and EV–ST (crosses), deviate significantly from the values (black line) predicted by the models. The GM method results (closed circles) almost fit the values predicted by the models.

The variation in splitting measurement results (φapp and δtapp) with the BAZ by different methods for two-layer anisotropic models, with the occurrence of horizontal component misalignment (θ0= 20°). Measurements by the traditional methods, SC–ST (diamonds), RC–ST (open circles) and EV–ST (crosses), deviate significantly from the values (black line) predicted by the models. The GM method results (closed circles) almost fit the values predicted by the models.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close