Figure 4
The same content as in Fig. 2, with random noise introduced into the seismograms. Before the splitting measurements, the north and east components were rotated counter-clockwise by θ=−20° to represent correcting the misalignment. After measurement, the best-fitting splitting parameters are φ= 50°, δt= 1.76 s by the SC method in (b), φ= 52°, δt= 1.68 s by the RC method in (c), and φ= 50°, δt= 1.76 s by the EV method in (d).

The same content as in Fig. 2, with random noise introduced into the seismograms. Before the splitting measurements, the north and east components were rotated counter-clockwise by θ=−20° to represent correcting the misalignment. After measurement, the best-fitting splitting parameters are φ= 50°, δt= 1.76 s by the SC method in (b), φ= 52°, δt= 1.68 s by the RC method in (c), and φ= 50°, δt= 1.76 s by the EV method in (d).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close