Fig. 4.
Comparison of fruit set in six populations of Linaria cavanillesii after different treatments: control bag (inflorescences were bagged at bud stage, anthers were removed prior to anthesis, and flowers were left unmanipulated); control (inflorescences were left unmanipulated); emasculation (emasc; anthers were removed prior to anthesis and the flowers were left unmanipulated) and supplementary outcross pollen (pollen_out; anthers were removed prior to anthesis, and, when mature, outcross pollen was applied to stigmas from at least two donor plants from the same population). SC, self-compatible population; SI, self-incompatible population; SC_SI, mixed population containing both types of plant. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. and the number of plants used for each treatment is indicated.

Comparison of fruit set in six populations of Linaria cavanillesii after different treatments: control bag (inflorescences were bagged at bud stage, anthers were removed prior to anthesis, and flowers were left unmanipulated); control (inflorescences were left unmanipulated); emasculation (emasc; anthers were removed prior to anthesis and the flowers were left unmanipulated) and supplementary outcross pollen (pollen_out; anthers were removed prior to anthesis, and, when mature, outcross pollen was applied to stigmas from at least two donor plants from the same population). SC, self-compatible population; SI, self-incompatible population; SC_SI, mixed population containing both types of plant. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. and the number of plants used for each treatment is indicated.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close