Figure 8.
Illustration of the time course of μ3 (upper panels) and s(μ2) (lower panels) during observation of x1 (black diamonds) for 2 exemplary subjects with different parameters for ω and $\vartheta $. The true %CV is depicted as a dotted line. It can be seen that subject A (ω = −6.09; $\vartheta = 0.\hbox{97}$) shows slower updating of the probability estimate that the target will appear at the cued location than subject B (ω = −2.78; $\vartheta = 0.\hbox{12}$). This can be attributed to subject A's lower value of ω (reflecting the subject's belief in a less volatile environment).

Illustration of the time course of μ3 (upper panels) and s(μ2) (lower panels) during observation of x1 (black diamonds) for 2 exemplary subjects with different parameters for ω and |$\vartheta $|⁠. The true %CV is depicted as a dotted line. It can be seen that subject A (ω = −6.09; |$\vartheta = 0.\hbox{97}$|⁠) shows slower updating of the probability estimate that the target will appear at the cued location than subject B (ω = −2.78; |$\vartheta = 0.\hbox{12}$|⁠). This can be attributed to subject A's lower value of ω (reflecting the subject's belief in a less volatile environment).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close