Figure B1.
Comparison between two different methods for estimating the significance level of absorption line features. The x-axis corresponds to the log (〈S/N〉res × N/b) values proposed by Richter et al. (2006) (at least for broad H i lines) where N is in units of cm−2 and b in km s−1, while the y-axis corresponds to our Wr/δWr (see Section 4.3). Blue triangles correspond to narrow H i absorption components (b < 50 km s−1), while red pentagons correspond to broad H i absorption components (b ≥ 50 km s−1), both found across the full Q1410 spectrum. White crosses mark components having multiple transitions, hence reliable (label ‘a’; see Section 4.5). The grey shaded area correspond to values Wr/δWr < 3, while the vertical dashed line correspond to a value of 〈S/N〉res × N/b = 2.5 × 1012 cm−2 (km s−1)−1. See Appendix B for further details.

Comparison between two different methods for estimating the significance level of absorption line features. The x-axis corresponds to the log (〈S/N〉res × N/b) values proposed by Richter et al. (2006) (at least for broad H i lines) where N is in units of cm−2 and b in km s−1, while the y-axis corresponds to our WrWr (see Section 4.3). Blue triangles correspond to narrow H i absorption components (b < 50 km s−1), while red pentagons correspond to broad H i absorption components (b ≥ 50 km s−1), both found across the full Q1410 spectrum. White crosses mark components having multiple transitions, hence reliable (label ‘a’; see Section 4.5). The grey shaded area correspond to values WrWr < 3, while the vertical dashed line correspond to a value of 〈S/N〉res × N/b = 2.5 × 1012 cm−2 (km s−1)−1. See Appendix B for further details.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close