Figure 5.
The CGH, showing the ‘largest energy bin detectable with Fermi-LAT’ versus redshift. The ‘largest energy bin’ is calculated as the mean energy of the four highest energy source-type events associated with each source, excluding PSF0 events (i.e. evclass = 128 and evtype = 56). The opacity regimes for EBL optical depths $\tau _{(E,z)} = 1.0$ and $\tau _{(E,z)} = 0.1$ are represented by grey dashed and magenta dot–dashed lines, respectively, corresponding to the Saldana-Lopez model (Saldana-Lopez et al. 2021). This plot highlights sources in the $\tau _{(E,z)} > 0.1$ regime where absorption may be detectable at the highest energy bin observed with Fermi-LAT, while sources in the $\tau < 0.1$ regime are represented by grey markers. Different markers indicate the quality of the redshift determination: robust (spectroscopic) redshifts are shown as filled circles; lower limit redshifts are represented by right arrows, with the reported redshift value corresponding to the centre of the arrow; and uncertain redshifts (photometric or unknown quality) are represented by blue crosses. Approximately one-third of the 1CGH sources lack redshift assignments and are therefore not included in this plot. Note: The $\tau _{(E,z)}$ values regarding the largest energy bin are listed in the 1CGH catalogue to help identify interesting targets.

The CGH, showing the ‘largest energy bin detectable with Fermi-LAT’ versus redshift. The ‘largest energy bin’ is calculated as the mean energy of the four highest energy source-type events associated with each source, excluding PSF0 events (i.e. evclass = 128 and evtype = 56). The opacity regimes for EBL optical depths |$\tau _{(E,z)} = 1.0$| and |$\tau _{(E,z)} = 0.1$| are represented by grey dashed and magenta dot–dashed lines, respectively, corresponding to the Saldana-Lopez model (Saldana-Lopez et al. 2021). This plot highlights sources in the |$\tau _{(E,z)} > 0.1$| regime where absorption may be detectable at the highest energy bin observed with Fermi-LAT, while sources in the |$\tau < 0.1$| regime are represented by grey markers. Different markers indicate the quality of the redshift determination: robust (spectroscopic) redshifts are shown as filled circles; lower limit redshifts are represented by right arrows, with the reported redshift value corresponding to the centre of the arrow; and uncertain redshifts (photometric or unknown quality) are represented by blue crosses. Approximately one-third of the 1CGH sources lack redshift assignments and are therefore not included in this plot. Note: The |$\tau _{(E,z)}$| values regarding the largest energy bin are listed in the 1CGH catalogue to help identify interesting targets.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close