Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the confusion matrix employed for ML classification in the context of biosignature searching. Instances (planets) in the first row possess biosignatures/bioindicators, while those in the second row do not. An algorithm labels instances (planets) in the first column as potentially having biosignatures (i.e. interesting), whereas those in the second column are not considered interesting. This framework illustrates the different classification outcomes, including true positives (TP), false positives (FP), true negatives (TN), and false negatives (FN), in the search for biosignatures/bioindicators.

Schematic representation of the confusion matrix employed for ML classification in the context of biosignature searching. Instances (planets) in the first row possess biosignatures/bioindicators, while those in the second row do not. An algorithm labels instances (planets) in the first column as potentially having biosignatures (i.e. interesting), whereas those in the second column are not considered interesting. This framework illustrates the different classification outcomes, including true positives (TP), false positives (FP), true negatives (TN), and false negatives (FN), in the search for biosignatures/bioindicators.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close