Figure 2.
A forest plot showing the odds ratio (OR) of total impacts of the RAG-enhanced system compared with the baseline LLM system in clinical tasks. The left panel lists individual studies (e.g., Zakka et al., Murugan et al., Long et al.) along with their corresponding ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The right panel visualizes these ORs, with square markers proportional to study weights and horizontal lines representing CIs. The overall pooled OR is 1.35 (95% CI: 1.19–1.53), represented by a diamond at the bottom.

A forest plot showing the odds ratio (OR) of total impacts of the RAG-enhanced system compared with the baseline LLM system in clinical tasks. The left panel lists individual studies (e.g., Zakka et al., Murugan et al., Long et al.) along with their corresponding ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The right panel visualizes these ORs, with square markers proportional to study weights and horizontal lines representing CIs. The overall pooled OR is 1.35 (95% CI: 1.19–1.53), represented by a diamond at the bottom.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close