Fig. 2.
An illustration of how decreasing homophily can cause a party-line polarization. Both figures correspond to (larger in-group favoritism compared to out-group animosity) and (a majority red group). First row corresponds to a homophilic network (intergroup links are more likely to form than intragroup links) with whereas second row corresponds to an unbiased network (all links are equally likely to form). Note that decreasing ρ from 0.7 (homophily) to 0.5 (unbiased) increases the effect of out-group hate and decreases the effect of in-group love on the choices, and pushes the social network from case 1 (consensus) to case 3 (party-line polarization) in Fig. 1 (with x-axis re-scaled as ).