Figure 8.
The role of relative versus absolute time differences between interviews Notes: The figure shows estimates of the autocorrelation based on equation (2). The black (gray) dots show the autocorrelation between the vote given to the candidate interviewed in t and the candidate interviewed in t−1(t−2), depending on the time between the end of the interview in t−1(t−2) and the start of the interview in t. Note that the autocorrelation with t−2 and t−1 are estimated on two different subsets of interviews. The cut-off at 45 minutes is chosen as the minimum time distance between t−2 and t. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. Standard errors are clustered at the workshop/candidate pool level (N = 312/N = 63)

The role of relative versus absolute time differences between interviews Notes: The figure shows estimates of the autocorrelation based on equation (2). The black (gray) dots show the autocorrelation between the vote given to the candidate interviewed in t and the candidate interviewed in t1(t2), depending on the time between the end of the interview in t1(t2) and the start of the interview in t. Note that the autocorrelation with t2 and t1 are estimated on two different subsets of interviews. The cut-off at 45 minutes is chosen as the minimum time distance between t2 and t. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. Standard errors are clustered at the workshop/candidate pool level (N = 312/N = 63)

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close