Figure 5
Influence of EZ depth on clinical response to multichannel tDCS. (A) Boxplots illustrate EZN depth determined by averaging the depth of each EZ regions (regions with normalized EI ≥ 0.4) for the responder (R) (In blue) and non-responder (NR) (in red) groups (n = 10 and n = 13, respectively). Each data point corresponds to the mean depth of EZ regions for each patient. The black bar with an asterisk marks a significant difference (pval = 0.025) between R and NR groups using the Wilcoxon test. (B) The scatter plot represents the Spearman correlation coefficient (R = 0.23) between the mean depth of EZ regions and the SF change after multiple cycles of multichannel tDCS.

Influence of EZ depth on clinical response to multichannel tDCS. (A) Boxplots illustrate EZN depth determined by averaging the depth of each EZ regions (regions with normalized EI ≥ 0.4) for the responder (R) (In blue) and non-responder (NR) (in red) groups (n = 10 and n = 13, respectively). Each data point corresponds to the mean depth of EZ regions for each patient. The black bar with an asterisk marks a significant difference (pval = 0.025) between R and NR groups using the Wilcoxon test. (B) The scatter plot represents the Spearman correlation coefficient (R = 0.23) between the mean depth of EZ regions and the SF change after multiple cycles of multichannel tDCS.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close