Figure 3.
(A) The 6-mer counts in the top 10% of the positive samples for TIA1 in K562 and HepG2 cell lines, using HDRNet and PrismNet methods, ranked by their prediction scores. (B) Predicted versus observed binding sites of TIA1 on the HNRNPH1 transcript. (C and D) TIA1 binding probabilities and saliency maps in HepG2 and K562 cells and the visualization of the RNA secondary structure.

(A) The 6-mer counts in the top 10% of the positive samples for TIA1 in K562 and HepG2 cell lines, using HDRNet and PrismNet methods, ranked by their prediction scores. (B) Predicted versus observed binding sites of TIA1 on the HNRNPH1 transcript. (C and D) TIA1 binding probabilities and saliency maps in HepG2 and K562 cells and the visualization of the RNA secondary structure.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close