Figure 9.
The fine-mapping performance of BEATRICE, SuSiE, and FINEMAP at a noise setting of {d=1,ω2=0.1,p=0.3}. (a) The absolute z-score of each variant as obtained from GWAS. (b) Pairwise correlation between the variants. (c–e) illustrate the posterior inclusion probabilities of each variant, as estimated by the three methods. The circle marked by an arrow shows the location of the causal variant. The other nonzero markers represent the variants assigned to a credible set, coded based on the assignment.

The fine-mapping performance of BEATRICE, SuSiE, and FINEMAP at a noise setting of {d=1,ω2=0.1,p=0.3}. (a) The absolute z-score of each variant as obtained from GWAS. (b) Pairwise correlation between the variants. (c–e) illustrate the posterior inclusion probabilities of each variant, as estimated by the three methods. The circle marked by an arrow shows the location of the causal variant. The other nonzero markers represent the variants assigned to a credible set, coded based on the assignment.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close