Figure 3.
Effective viscosities calculated from the resistivity cross-section under different electrical conduction models. (a)–(c) The effective viscosities transformed from eq. (10) for $V_\mathrm{Si}^{^{\prime\prime\prime \prime}}/\mathrm{ Fe}_\mathrm{m}^ \cdot $ (anhydrous) and $( {3\mathrm{ H}} )_\mathrm{Si}^{\prime}$/${\mathrm{ H}^ \cdot }$ (hydrous) models and a combination of these two models at different depths. (d) and (e) are ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ lithosphere extracted from Deng et al. (2017). The five triangles in panels (a) and (d) mark the locations for comparison in Fig. 4.

Effective viscosities calculated from the resistivity cross-section under different electrical conduction models. (a)–(c) The effective viscosities transformed from eq. (10) for |$V_\mathrm{Si}^{^{\prime\prime\prime \prime}}/\mathrm{ Fe}_\mathrm{m}^ \cdot $| (anhydrous) and |$( {3\mathrm{ H}} )_\mathrm{Si}^{\prime}$|/|${\mathrm{ H}^ \cdot }$| (hydrous) models and a combination of these two models at different depths. (d) and (e) are ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ lithosphere extracted from Deng et al. (2017). The five triangles in panels (a) and (d) mark the locations for comparison in Fig. 4.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close