Figure 3.
Performance and accuracy comparison of HAlign4, HAlign3, MAFFT, MUSCLE, and Clustal Omega. (A–C) show scaled SP score, Q score (solid line), TC score (dashed line), and time and memory usage across different sequence lengths. (D–F) display the same metrics across different sequence similarities. Horizontal axes in (A–C) represent sequence length, while in (D–F) they represent sequence similarity. Vertical axes in (A, D) represent scaled SP score, in (B, E) Q and TC scores, and in (C, F) time (s) and memory (MB). Note: For a detailed explanation of the SP score, Q score, and TC score metrics, please refer to Section 3.2.

Performance and accuracy comparison of HAlign4, HAlign3, MAFFT, MUSCLE, and Clustal Omega. (A–C) show scaled SP score, Q score (solid line), TC score (dashed line), and time and memory usage across different sequence lengths. (D–F) display the same metrics across different sequence similarities. Horizontal axes in (A–C) represent sequence length, while in (D–F) they represent sequence similarity. Vertical axes in (A, D) represent scaled SP score, in (B, E) Q and TC scores, and in (C, F) time (s) and memory (MB). Note: For a detailed explanation of the SP score, Q score, and TC score metrics, please refer to Section 3.2.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close