Figure 3.
The initial phase of the inference is monitored by following the systematic drift of the power spectrum and two configurations of the reduced bispectrum towards the fiducial ground truths. After a few thousand samples, we approach the regime of per cent-level agreement with the power spectrum and bispectrum. More samples are needed to enter the typical set from which plausible Gaussian initial conditions can be sampled. Model mis-specification between the ground truth (N-body) and the BORG-EM predicted fields shows up as small discrepancies at the largest scales, as a consequence of putting most weight on fitting the smallest scales where most statistical power resides.

The initial phase of the inference is monitored by following the systematic drift of the power spectrum and two configurations of the reduced bispectrum towards the fiducial ground truths. After a few thousand samples, we approach the regime of per cent-level agreement with the power spectrum and bispectrum. More samples are needed to enter the typical set from which plausible Gaussian initial conditions can be sampled. Model mis-specification between the ground truth (N-body) and the BORG-EM predicted fields shows up as small discrepancies at the largest scales, as a consequence of putting most weight on fitting the smallest scales where most statistical power resides.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close