Figure 2.
Interaction effects. (a) For all categories of stimuli, participants rated them as more positive (i.e. regarding the Affective Valence dimension) following beta and theta stimulations, showing an enhancement in subjective ratings following those neurostimulations, but not the sham mode. (b) For all categories of stimuli, participants rated them as more calming (i.e. regarding the Arousal dimension) following theta stimulation, showing a decrease in how participants rated the arousing of images Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (±SEM).

Interaction effects. (a) For all categories of stimuli, participants rated them as more positive (i.e. regarding the Affective Valence dimension) following beta and theta stimulations, showing an enhancement in subjective ratings following those neurostimulations, but not the sham mode. (b) For all categories of stimuli, participants rated them as more calming (i.e. regarding the Arousal dimension) following theta stimulation, showing a decrease in how participants rated the arousing of images Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (±SEM).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close