Figure 16.
The stacked imaging sections of the target line after PSDM. (a) and (e) The vacuum method imaging results with dominant frequencies of 15 and 20 Hz, respectively. (c) and (g) The 3DIBM imaging results at these frequencies. The second column showing (b), (d), (f), and (h) are enlarged views of the regions within the black dashed boxes in (a), (c), (e), and (g), respectively, highlighting the disparities produced by the two modelling techniques.

The stacked imaging sections of the target line after PSDM. (a) and (e) The vacuum method imaging results with dominant frequencies of 15 and 20 Hz, respectively. (c) and (g) The 3DIBM imaging results at these frequencies. The second column showing (b), (d), (f), and (h) are enlarged views of the regions within the black dashed boxes in (a), (c), (e), and (g), respectively, highlighting the disparities produced by the two modelling techniques.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close