Fig. 6.
Effect of BGS combined with bottlenecks and low X-linked mutation rate on diversity patterns. The models considered include the combination of a bottleneck model with 1 of 3 BGS models each combined with a lower X-linked mutation rate (µX/µA = 0.9, µX/µA = 0.75). For the BGS models, we varied the proportion of deleterious mutations (10, 50, and 80%) while the DFE for the deleterious selection coefficient (sd) was gamma distributed with mean and shape parameter of −0.000133 and 0.35, respectively (Huber et al. 2017). The recombination rate was set to r = 5e−7 cM/bp across all simulations. Supplementary Fig. 8 shows the same corresponding plot for half the recombination rate (2.5e−7 cM/bp). The left column corresponds to a severe short bottleneck model and the right column to a shallow long bottleneck model (see Methods). For each model, we computed a) πX/πA across all models, where the red dashed line corresponds to the expected πX/πA = 0.75 value in the neutral model; b) πX/πX, bottleneck where πX, bottleneck is the average π in the corresponding bottleneck model with no added biases and the solid gray line is 20% of πX, bottleneck; and c) haplotype homozygosity across all models and results from a 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test for elevation of H in the bottleneck + BGS + low µX scenario compared to a neutral bottleneck model.

Effect of BGS combined with bottlenecks and low X-linked mutation rate on diversity patterns. The models considered include the combination of a bottleneck model with 1 of 3 BGS models each combined with a lower X-linked mutation rate (µX/µA = 0.9, µX/µA = 0.75). For the BGS models, we varied the proportion of deleterious mutations (10, 50, and 80%) while the DFE for the deleterious selection coefficient (sd) was gamma distributed with mean and shape parameter of −0.000133 and 0.35, respectively (Huber et al. 2017). The recombination rate was set to r = 5e−7 cM/bp across all simulations. Supplementary Fig. 8 shows the same corresponding plot for half the recombination rate (2.5e−7 cM/bp). The left column corresponds to a severe short bottleneck model and the right column to a shallow long bottleneck model (see Methods). For each model, we computed a) πX/πA across all models, where the red dashed line corresponds to the expected πX/πA = 0.75 value in the neutral model; b) πX/πX, bottleneck where πX, bottleneck is the average π in the corresponding bottleneck model with no added biases and the solid gray line is 20% of πX, bottleneck; and c) haplotype homozygosity across all models and results from a 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test for elevation of H in the bottleneck + BGS + low µX scenario compared to a neutral bottleneck model.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close