Fig. 8.
Estimation results for policy periods. (a) EFA biodiversity score. (b) Farm biodiversity score. (c) Non-EFA biodiversity score. Notes: Point estimates from linear fixed effects estimation with clustered standard errors. Number of farms n = 410, time periods T = 1–12, number of observations $N = 2,341$. The model is fully interacted with the Post variable, which is equal to 1 for observations after the new policy regime (≥2014) and 0 otherwise. $S*Post$ gives the effect of interest for the post-reform period. Source: Authors’ illustrations using SAEDN and SFADN 2009–2020.

Estimation results for policy periods. (a) EFA biodiversity score. (b) Farm biodiversity score. (c) Non-EFA biodiversity score. Notes: Point estimates from linear fixed effects estimation with clustered standard errors. Number of farms n = 410, time periods T = 1–12, number of observations |$N = 2,341$|⁠. The model is fully interacted with the Post variable, which is equal to 1 for observations after the new policy regime (≥2014) and 0 otherwise. |$S*Post$| gives the effect of interest for the post-reform period. Source: Authors’ illustrations using SAEDN and SFADN 2009–2020.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close