Figure 8.
Comparison of the simulated breaking radius to analytical predictions. Top: Analytical time-scales as predicted from equations (12) and (13). Here, $r_{\rm {in}}$ is calculated to be $2.2a_{\rm b}$ (see text for details). Bottom: Surface density of the $\alpha = 10^{-5}$ simulation at $t = 100$ binary orbits, in units of the initial surface density profile $\Sigma _0$. The breaking radius is denoted by the sharp dip in $\Sigma /\Sigma _0$. In both plots, vertical dashed lines indicate the predicted locations of the breaking radius.

Comparison of the simulated breaking radius to analytical predictions. Top: Analytical time-scales as predicted from equations (12) and (13). Here, |$r_{\rm {in}}$| is calculated to be |$2.2a_{\rm b}$| (see text for details). Bottom: Surface density of the |$\alpha = 10^{-5}$| simulation at |$t = 100$| binary orbits, in units of the initial surface density profile |$\Sigma _0$|⁠. The breaking radius is denoted by the sharp dip in |$\Sigma /\Sigma _0$|⁠. In both plots, vertical dashed lines indicate the predicted locations of the breaking radius.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close