Figure 6
Abundance of Kir2.2 reduces the slope conductance of the inward IK1 in atrial Kir2.1E299V channels. A, Western blots for Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 protein levels in atrial and ventricular tissue samples from mice comparing the Kir2.1 (i) and Kir2.2 (ii) expression levels. (iii) Quantification of total Kir2.1 protein levels (top) and Kir.1/Kir2.2 ratio (bottom) in atria vs. ventricles from Kir2.1WT and Kir2.1E299V animals (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001; duplicate experiments in N = 4 animals per condition; Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as loading control for all comparisons). B, IV relationship of IK1 in HEK-293 cells transfected with dimers expressing Kir2.1WT-Kir2.2WT or Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT (N = 3 independent transfections; n = 8–9 cells per condition; P < 0.05 for voltages negative to −80 mV). We used a modified external solution (30 mM KCl and 110 mM NaCl) to promote the IK1 current, shifting the reversal potential towards more positive voltages (from −80 to −30 mV). C, In-silico simulations of Kir2.1WT-Kir2.1E299V compared to Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT (2.4Å vs. 4.87Å in the extracellular pore of Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT and Kir2.1WT-Kir2.2WT, respectively; 0.49Å vs. 1.62Å in the cytoplasmic pore for Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT and Kir2.1WT-Kir2.1E299V, respectively). We applied Welch’s t-test and two-way ANOVA for comparisons.

Abundance of Kir2.2 reduces the slope conductance of the inward IK1 in atrial Kir2.1E299V channels. A, Western blots for Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 protein levels in atrial and ventricular tissue samples from mice comparing the Kir2.1 (i) and Kir2.2 (ii) expression levels. (iii) Quantification of total Kir2.1 protein levels (top) and Kir.1/Kir2.2 ratio (bottom) in atria vs. ventricles from Kir2.1WT and Kir2.1E299V animals (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001; duplicate experiments in N = 4 animals per condition; Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as loading control for all comparisons). B, IV relationship of IK1 in HEK-293 cells transfected with dimers expressing Kir2.1WT-Kir2.2WT or Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT (N = 3 independent transfections; n = 8–9 cells per condition; P < 0.05 for voltages negative to −80 mV). We used a modified external solution (30 mM KCl and 110 mM NaCl) to promote the IK1 current, shifting the reversal potential towards more positive voltages (from −80 to −30 mV). C, In-silico simulations of Kir2.1WT-Kir2.1E299V compared to Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT (2.4Å vs. 4.87Å in the extracellular pore of Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT and Kir2.1WT-Kir2.2WT, respectively; 0.49Å vs. 1.62Å in the cytoplasmic pore for Kir2.1E299V-Kir2.2WT and Kir2.1WT-Kir2.1E299V, respectively). We applied Welch’s t-test and two-way ANOVA for comparisons.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close