Figure 1
EAT mass assessment. (A) Example of quantification of EAT mass. Manual tracing was performed from the pulmonary artery bifurcation (superior limit) to the PDA (inferior limit), and the adipose tissue within the pericardium was automatically recognized by the software as tissue with Hounsfield Units (HU) between −195 and −45. (B) Histograms of frequencies of EAT mass. Median value of EAT mass in study cohort was 67 g. EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; PDA, posterior descending coronary artery.

EAT mass assessment. (A) Example of quantification of EAT mass. Manual tracing was performed from the pulmonary artery bifurcation (superior limit) to the PDA (inferior limit), and the adipose tissue within the pericardium was automatically recognized by the software as tissue with Hounsfield Units (HU) between −195 and −45. (B) Histograms of frequencies of EAT mass. Median value of EAT mass in study cohort was 67 g. EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; PDA, posterior descending coronary artery.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close