Fig. 3.
Abundance ratio ([X$/$Fe]) of LAMOST J011939.222−012150.45 compared with the chemical composition predicted from different AGB models with metallicity [Fe$/$H] = −2.6. The solid line represents the best-fit model, with the initial mass $M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.4\, M_{\odot }$ and cases ST$/$6. Two other models are shown for comparison, with $M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.4\, M_{\odot }$ and ST$/$9 (dashed line), and $M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.3\, M_{\odot }$ and ST$/$6 (dash-dotted line), respectively, as displayed in Bisterzo et al. (2010). ST$/$6 and ST$/$9 refer to the cases dividing the 13C abundances in the pocket of the standard model (Arlandini et al. 1999) by factors of 6 and 9, respectively. The circles with error bars indicate the observational abundances. (Color online)

Abundance ratio ([X|$/$|Fe]) of LAMOST J011939.222−012150.45 compared with the chemical composition predicted from different AGB models with metallicity [Fe|$/$|H] = −2.6. The solid line represents the best-fit model, with the initial mass |$M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.4\, M_{\odot }$| and cases ST|$/$|6. Two other models are shown for comparison, with |$M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.4\, M_{\odot }$| and ST|$/$|9 (dashed line), and |$M_{\,\rm ini} = 1.3\, M_{\odot }$| and ST|$/$|6 (dash-dotted line), respectively, as displayed in Bisterzo et al. (2010). ST|$/$|6 and ST|$/$|9 refer to the cases dividing the 13C abundances in the pocket of the standard model (Arlandini et al. 1999) by factors of 6 and 9, respectively. The circles with error bars indicate the observational abundances. (Color online)

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close