Fig. 14.
From left to right: full light curves from the exposure starting time, partial light curves, Lomb–Scargle periodograms with n of 1, and phased light curves of the NEOs whose rotational periods are derived with high reliability. Solid, dashed, and dot–dashed horizontal lines in the periodograms show $90.0\%$, $99.0\%$, and $99.9\%$ confidence levels, respectively. Confidence lines of some NEOs with strong peaks are hard to see due to scale effects. Dashed lines in the phased light curves show the model curves. Twice the rotational periods are adopted as time ranges of the partial light curves.

From left to right: full light curves from the exposure starting time, partial light curves, Lomb–Scargle periodograms with n of 1, and phased light curves of the NEOs whose rotational periods are derived with high reliability. Solid, dashed, and dot–dashed horizontal lines in the periodograms show |$90.0\%$|⁠, |$99.0\%$|⁠, and |$99.9\%$| confidence levels, respectively. Confidence lines of some NEOs with strong peaks are hard to see due to scale effects. Dashed lines in the phased light curves show the model curves. Twice the rotational periods are adopted as time ranges of the partial light curves.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close