Figure 6.
Regression pipeline of IWF-KNOW (ranked 4th). The light curves on the left are two examples in $\boldsymbol{\mathit{\widetilde{X}}}_{p,k}$. The minima of the light curves were estimated using the 1st, 5th, and 10th percentiles. Subsequently, the minima were used to calculate the dips of the light curves ΔFp, k, j, r. The square root of all light curve dips ΔFp, k, j, r belonging to the same planet p (i.e. including all wavelengths j and all stellar spot instances k), and additionally the stellar and planetary parameters zp, 1, …, zp, 6, were then gathered in the feature vector $\boldsymbol{\mathit{f}}_p^{*}$. The feature vector was z-score normalized (not shown in the graphic). Eventually, linear regressions were used to calculate the relative planet radius for each wavelength j.

Regression pipeline of IWF-KNOW (ranked 4th). The light curves on the left are two examples in |$\boldsymbol{\mathit{\widetilde{X}}}_{p,k}$|⁠. The minima of the light curves were estimated using the 1st, 5th, and 10th percentiles. Subsequently, the minima were used to calculate the dips of the light curves ΔFp, k, j, r. The square root of all light curve dips ΔFp, k, j, r belonging to the same planet p (i.e. including all wavelengths j and all stellar spot instances k), and additionally the stellar and planetary parameters zp, 1, …, zp, 6, were then gathered in the feature vector |$\boldsymbol{\mathit{f}}_p^{*}$|⁠. The feature vector was z-score normalized (not shown in the graphic). Eventually, linear regressions were used to calculate the relative planet radius for each wavelength j.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close