Fig. 6
Interlaminar and intralaminar conduction velocity. (A) Interlaminar velocity (302 ± 115 μm/ms, 21 slices) was ⁓71% faster than intralaminar velocity [177 ± 87 μm/ms, 10 slices; t(22.996) = 3.344, P = 0.003, Welch’s two-sample t-test]. Symbol shapes indicate velocity trajectory (in legend), and group mean ± SE are shown in red. (B) L4 → L2/3 or L5 (286 ± 127 μm/ms, three slices), L5 → L2/3 (296 ± 122 μm/ms, 16 slices), L2/3 intralaminar (200 ± 93 μm/ms, six slices) and L4 intralaminar (142 ± 76 μm/ms, four slices) velocity. Error bars indicate SE.

Interlaminar and intralaminar conduction velocity. (A) Interlaminar velocity (302 ± 115 μm/ms, 21 slices) was ⁓71% faster than intralaminar velocity [177 ± 87 μm/ms, 10 slices; t(22.996) = 3.344, P = 0.003, Welch’s two-sample t-test]. Symbol shapes indicate velocity trajectory (in legend), and group mean ± SE are shown in red. (B) L4 → L2/3 or L5 (286 ± 127 μm/ms, three slices), L5 → L2/3 (296 ± 122 μm/ms, 16 slices), L2/3 intralaminar (200 ± 93 μm/ms, six slices) and L4 intralaminar (142 ± 76 μm/ms, four slices) velocity. Error bars indicate SE.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close