Figure 6.
TPS dependency on the data size for various datasets and queries. Observed trend (box plots) and predicted trend (solid lines) are shown for DM (red) and RLS (blue). TPS drop (coefficient of the hyperbolic fit) is given for both the query methods, showing that RLS runs on average 3.55 and on median 2.71 times slower compared to DM. Note that the plots use logarithmic scaling.