Figure 6.
TPS dependency on the data size for various datasets and queries. Observed trend (box plots) and predicted trend (solid lines) are shown for DM (red) and RLS (blue). TPS drop (coefficient of the hyperbolic fit) is given for both the query methods, showing that RLS runs on average 3.55 and on median 2.71 times slower compared to DM. Note that the plots use logarithmic scaling.

TPS dependency on the data size for various datasets and queries. Observed trend (box plots) and predicted trend (solid lines) are shown for DM (red) and RLS (blue). TPS drop (coefficient of the hyperbolic fit) is given for both the query methods, showing that RLS runs on average 3.55 and on median 2.71 times slower compared to DM. Note that the plots use logarithmic scaling.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close