Figure 3.
Layer specificity of microdissected neurons. (A) Representative tumor mass and peritumoral neurons in the primary visual cortex. The box indicates the ROI for the laser-capture microdissection (LCM). Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Representative images of LCM: Labeled neurons were selected (left), removed by the laser (middle), and collected in the adhesive cap (right). (C) Gene-expression analysis of Slc17a7 and Slc32a1 in all samples detected by quantitative real-time PCR. Slc17a7 encoded for vGlut1 protein, specific for glutamatergic neurons; Slc32a1 encoded for the protein vGat specific for inhibitory neurons. The mean ± sem is shown for each group. (D) Layer organization of primary visual cortex and corresponding layer-specific genes included in the panel: Cux1 is a marker of the layers II-III, cTip2 of the layers V-VI, and FoxP2 of the inner layer VI. Scale bar 100μm. Gene-expression values were normalized for reference genes and expressed as an increase or decrease relative to the inter-run calibrator (Hellemans et al., 2008; Rieu and Powers, 2009). The mean ± sem is shown for each group.

Layer specificity of microdissected neurons. (A) Representative tumor mass and peritumoral neurons in the primary visual cortex. The box indicates the ROI for the laser-capture microdissection (LCM). Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Representative images of LCM: Labeled neurons were selected (left), removed by the laser (middle), and collected in the adhesive cap (right). (C) Gene-expression analysis of Slc17a7 and Slc32a1 in all samples detected by quantitative real-time PCR. Slc17a7 encoded for vGlut1 protein, specific for glutamatergic neurons; Slc32a1 encoded for the protein vGat specific for inhibitory neurons. The mean ± sem is shown for each group. (D) Layer organization of primary visual cortex and corresponding layer-specific genes included in the panel: Cux1 is a marker of the layers II-III, cTip2 of the layers V-VI, and FoxP2 of the inner layer VI. Scale bar 100μm. Gene-expression values were normalized for reference genes and expressed as an increase or decrease relative to the inter-run calibrator (Hellemans et al., 2008; Rieu and Powers, 2009). The mean ± sem is shown for each group.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close