Fig. 4
Effect of provocation between both groups. This figure depicts significant effects of technical, nonsocial frustration, and social provocation on neural network connectivity between groups. A) The effects of nonsocial frustration (run 2 > run 1) and social provocation (run 3 > run 2) on regions of the social brain (Alcalá-López et al. 2018, see Fig. 3 for abbreviations) were compared between offenders and controls (P(unc.) < 0.005, PFDR < 0.05 in bold). B) Boxplots illustrating beta-values of significant differences in connectivity for each group. Beta-values of each participant were extracted on the first level for the significant connectivity (e.g. vmPFC—FFA). Displayed are mean group values for controls and offenders and the respective standard deviations.

Effect of provocation between both groups. This figure depicts significant effects of technical, nonsocial frustration, and social provocation on neural network connectivity between groups. A) The effects of nonsocial frustration (run 2 > run 1) and social provocation (run 3 > run 2) on regions of the social brain (Alcalá-López et al. 2018, see Fig. 3 for abbreviations) were compared between offenders and controls (P(unc.) < 0.005, PFDR < 0.05 in bold). B) Boxplots illustrating beta-values of significant differences in connectivity for each group. Beta-values of each participant were extracted on the first level for the significant connectivity (e.g. vmPFC—FFA). Displayed are mean group values for controls and offenders and the respective standard deviations.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close