Figure 4
Compare clustering results of Visium human IDC data. (A, B) Louvain clustering displays of imputed Visium human IDC using two strategies. (A) Based on self-supervised learning strategy. (B) Based on transfer learning model trained on a high-quality data, Visium mouse sagittal posterior brain. (C) Clustering performance of original (orange) and imputed (blue) IDC in obtaining smooth and continuous spatial domains measured by LISI. Lower LISI score indicates more homogeneous and continuous spatial structure. (D) Domains from original expression. (E) Merged version of (B), having matched domains with (D) by the same color.

Compare clustering results of Visium human IDC data. (A, B) Louvain clustering displays of imputed Visium human IDC using two strategies. (A) Based on self-supervised learning strategy. (B) Based on transfer learning model trained on a high-quality data, Visium mouse sagittal posterior brain. (C) Clustering performance of original (orange) and imputed (blue) IDC in obtaining smooth and continuous spatial domains measured by LISI. Lower LISI score indicates more homogeneous and continuous spatial structure. (D) Domains from original expression. (E) Merged version of (B), having matched domains with (D) by the same color.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close