Figure 2.
Theoretical analysis and structural characterization. (a) Diagrams of LiNiO2, Ta-doped LiNiO2 and Ce-doped LiNiO2 and their doping energy barriers on (003), (111), (104) and (012) planes. (b) Intensity ratios of (003)/(104) XRD peaks of LiNi0.9Co0.1O2 with various Ta contents after normalizing the (003) peak. (c) STEM–HAADF image of the cross section for NCTa1–CeO2. (d) High-resolution TEM. (e) Corresponding EDS mapping images of NCTa1–CeO2. (f) Cs-STEM–HAADF image with the corresponding FT image of NCTa1–CeO2. (g) Enlarged STEM–HAADF image and the diagram of EDS line scan. (h) EDS line analysis of annular dark-field signals and Ta signals.

Theoretical analysis and structural characterization. (a) Diagrams of LiNiO2, Ta-doped LiNiO2 and Ce-doped LiNiO2 and their doping energy barriers on (003), (111), (104) and (012) planes. (b) Intensity ratios of (003)/(104) XRD peaks of LiNi0.9Co0.1O2 with various Ta contents after normalizing the (003) peak. (c) STEM–HAADF image of the cross section for NCTa1–CeO2. (d) High-resolution TEM. (e) Corresponding EDS mapping images of NCTa1–CeO2. (f) Cs-STEM–HAADF image with the corresponding FT image of NCTa1–CeO2. (g) Enlarged STEM–HAADF image and the diagram of EDS line scan. (h) EDS line analysis of annular dark-field signals and Ta signals.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close