Figure 6
 Abnormal transition from conjugal development to the first vegetative cell division in heterozygous C3ΔRFB/B progeny. ( A ) Normal kinetics for pair formation and separation in C3ΔRFB mutant progeny. Microscopic analysis of pair formation and separation in wild-type crosses [SB210 × TX614(1)], crosses between wild-type and mutant strains [SB210 × TX607(1), SB210 × TX610(11), SB210 × TX611(1)] and cross between two mutant strains [TX607(1) × TX610(11)]. ( B ) Cytological examination of crosses between wild-type strain SB210 and wild-type C3 rDNA transformant, TX614(1) (WT × WT),or SB210 and C3ΔRFB transformant, TX607(1) (WT × Mutant) with the DNA staining dye apofluor. The vast majority of cells displayed normal progression through development (data not shown), with a small percentage of mutant mating partners containing extra micronuclei/pronuclei prior to genetic exchange (compare micrographs 1 and 6). Panels 2–5 (WT × WT) and 7 ×10 (WT × Mutant) depict representative cells in exconjugant mating populations (24 h mating followed by 7–9 h re-feeding). ( C ) Cartoon depicting the progression of mating cells during development (0–24 h) and the fate of exconjugants after re-feeding at 24 h for (WT × WT), and (WT × mutant) or (mutant × mutant) crosses. See text for details. ( D ) Quantification of the number of ‘abnormal cells’ for different mating 7–9 h after re-feeding (see text for details). ( E ) Progeny of crosses between TX611(1) and A* mating type III obtained by single pair isolation after 23–25 h and subsequent propagation for 5–10 passages. Note the appearance of extra nuclei in the mutant (micrographs 2–4) compared with wild-type (micrograph 1). Staining: apofluor (micrographs 1–3), DAPI (micrograph 4).

Abnormal transition from conjugal development to the first vegetative cell division in heterozygous C3ΔRFB/B progeny. ( A ) Normal kinetics for pair formation and separation in C3ΔRFB mutant progeny. Microscopic analysis of pair formation and separation in wild-type crosses [SB210 × TX614(1)], crosses between wild-type and mutant strains [SB210 × TX607(1), SB210 × TX610(11), SB210 × TX611(1)] and cross between two mutant strains [TX607(1) × TX610(11)]. ( B ) Cytological examination of crosses between wild-type strain SB210 and wild-type C3 rDNA transformant, TX614(1) (WT × WT),or SB210 and C3ΔRFB transformant, TX607(1) (WT × Mutant) with the DNA staining dye apofluor. The vast majority of cells displayed normal progression through development (data not shown), with a small percentage of mutant mating partners containing extra micronuclei/pronuclei prior to genetic exchange (compare micrographs 1 and 6). Panels 2–5 (WT × WT) and 7 ×10 (WT × Mutant) depict representative cells in exconjugant mating populations (24 h mating followed by 7–9 h re-feeding). ( C ) Cartoon depicting the progression of mating cells during development (0–24 h) and the fate of exconjugants after re-feeding at 24 h for (WT × WT), and (WT × mutant) or (mutant × mutant) crosses. See text for details. ( D ) Quantification of the number of ‘abnormal cells’ for different mating 7–9 h after re-feeding (see text for details). ( E ) Progeny of crosses between TX611(1) and A* mating type III obtained by single pair isolation after 23–25 h and subsequent propagation for 5–10 passages. Note the appearance of extra nuclei in the mutant (micrographs 2–4) compared with wild-type (micrograph 1). Staining: apofluor (micrographs 1–3), DAPI (micrograph 4).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close