Figure 2
Behavioral data and comparison of information tracking in visual cortex. (A) Behavioral lip-reading abilities. Participants recognized numbers the most, followed by words and sentences. (B) Correlation between age and lip-reading score revealed no significant correlation (P = 0.66), suggesting that lip-reading abilities do not change with age. The blue line depicts regression line, and shaded areas depict standard error of mean (SE). (C) Overlap of voxels reaching at least 90% of the maximum coherence value for the respective speech feature. Occipital areas show a strong overlap of highest coherence values over speech features. (D) Mean values extracted from all voxels in occipital cortex showing no significant differences in lip–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.695) but showing significant differences in unheard envelope-brain coherence (PFDR = 0.041) and unheard pitch–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.042) and a trend for the formant–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.095) between natural and reversed presentation of visual speech. Error bars represent 1 SE for within-subject designs (O’Brien and Cousineau 2014), and δ indicates the relative change between natural and reversed conditions in percent.

Behavioral data and comparison of information tracking in visual cortex. (A) Behavioral lip-reading abilities. Participants recognized numbers the most, followed by words and sentences. (B) Correlation between age and lip-reading score revealed no significant correlation (P = 0.66), suggesting that lip-reading abilities do not change with age. The blue line depicts regression line, and shaded areas depict standard error of mean (SE). (C) Overlap of voxels reaching at least 90% of the maximum coherence value for the respective speech feature. Occipital areas show a strong overlap of highest coherence values over speech features. (D) Mean values extracted from all voxels in occipital cortex showing no significant differences in lip–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.695) but showing significant differences in unheard envelope-brain coherence (PFDR = 0.041) and unheard pitch–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.042) and a trend for the formant–brain coherence (PFDR = 0.095) between natural and reversed presentation of visual speech. Error bars represent 1 SE for within-subject designs (O’Brien and Cousineau 2014), and δ indicates the relative change between natural and reversed conditions in percent.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close