Performance comparison between scDeconv and RPC. (A) For the 100 RNA simulated samples in batch1, scDeconv and RPC perform similarly well on all four cell types. The x-axes are the true cell contents of the simulated data and the y-axes are the estimated ones from the models, and each dot is a simulated sample. (B) For the 10 batches of the simulated samples, scDeconv and RPC have similar PCCs, but the MAD and RMSD of scDeconv are better than RPC.