Figure 2
Simulation evaluation on the accuracy of imputing offspring genotypes. (A–D) The results for the AI-RIL, the F2, the MAGIC, and the CP, respectively, are shown. In the figure legend on the right side, “_AD” denotes that the input data are allelic depths rather than called genotypes, “_NoP” denotes that the first two founders’ genotypes are not available, and “_Ref” and “_NoRef” denotes whether Beagle uses founder haplotypes as reference panels or not. When the input data are called genotypes, complete homozygosity is assumed for the AI-RIL and the MAGIC, and thus their missing fractions on the top axes are smaller than those of the F2 and the CP at the same depths.

Simulation evaluation on the accuracy of imputing offspring genotypes. (A–D) The results for the AI-RIL, the F2, the MAGIC, and the CP, respectively, are shown. In the figure legend on the right side, “_AD” denotes that the input data are allelic depths rather than called genotypes, “_NoP” denotes that the first two founders’ genotypes are not available, and “_Ref” and “_NoRef” denotes whether Beagle uses founder haplotypes as reference panels or not. When the input data are called genotypes, complete homozygosity is assumed for the AI-RIL and the MAGIC, and thus their missing fractions on the top axes are smaller than those of the F2 and the CP at the same depths.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close