Figure 9
Distribution of inverted moment release rates derived from inversion of the synthetic data sets of Figs 7(a)-(c) with the EIV model (eq. 8); separate distributions were derived from each velocity field. Different cases correspond to relaxation on the Earth model with viscosity: (a) ηm= 2 × 1019 Pa s, (b) ηm= 8 × 1019 Pa s, (c) ηm= 6.4 × 1019 Pa s. A constant crust-to-mantle viscosity ratio ηc/ηm= 2.5 is assumed. In each case, the roughness term of the misfit function (eq. 26) has been uniquely chosen such that the inverted velocity field yields 97 per cent variance reduction with respect to the synthetic velocity field. Contour lines are drawn (in units of 1014 N m km−2 yr) at values −0.1, −0.05, +0.1, +0.25 for  and at ±0.05, ±0.1 for .

Distribution of inverted moment release rates derived from inversion of the synthetic data sets of Figs 7(a)-(c) with the EIV model (eq. 8); separate distributions were derived from each velocity field. Different cases correspond to relaxation on the Earth model with viscosity: (a) ηm= 2 × 1019 Pa s, (b) ηm= 8 × 1019 Pa s, (c) ηm= 6.4 × 1019 Pa s. A constant crust-to-mantle viscosity ratio ηcm= 2.5 is assumed. In each case, the roughness term of the misfit function (eq. 26) has been uniquely chosen such that the inverted velocity field yields 97 per cent variance reduction with respect to the synthetic velocity field. Contour lines are drawn (in units of 1014 N m km−2 yr) at values −0.1, −0.05, +0.1, +0.25 for formula and at ±0.05, ±0.1 for formula.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close