Figure 6
Present day shallow and deep density anomaly distribution predicted by models A (panel a2) and B (panel b2), with crust density of 2670 kg m−3. Dashed black lines indicates the 300 and 1500 K isotherms. Panels (a1) and (b1) shows the corresponding surface gravity anomalies predicted by, respectively, model A and model B (continuum black lines), compared to the gravity anomalies due to solely thermal contraction and assuming no crust–mantle density stratification.

Present day shallow and deep density anomaly distribution predicted by models A (panel a2) and B (panel b2), with crust density of 2670 kg m−3. Dashed black lines indicates the 300 and 1500 K isotherms. Panels (a1) and (b1) shows the corresponding surface gravity anomalies predicted by, respectively, model A and model B (continuum black lines), compared to the gravity anomalies due to solely thermal contraction and assuming no crust–mantle density stratification.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close