Figure 7
Comparison between computed (in red) and observed (in blue) waveforms for (a) the 2003 July 29 earthquake, (b) the 2004 December 13 earthquake, and (c) the 2006 June 21 earthquake. The waveforms have been filtered between 0.1 and 0.5 Hz. The goodness-of-fit factor fa is computed using the amplitude of the filtered waveforms, and is defined in eq. (3).

Comparison between computed (in red) and observed (in blue) waveforms for (a) the 2003 July 29 earthquake, (b) the 2004 December 13 earthquake, and (c) the 2006 June 21 earthquake. The waveforms have been filtered between 0.1 and 0.5 Hz. The goodness-of-fit factor fa is computed using the amplitude of the filtered waveforms, and is defined in eq. (3).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close