Figure 4
Sensitivity analysis of inversions of GPS velocity data (Fig. 2) for the velocity gradient field. Results for size[C] (eq. 2, Figs 1a, 2a and 3a), size[S] (eq. 3, Figs 1b, 2b and 3b), the normalized root-mean-square misfit (eq. 4) of the ∇×∇v= 0 constraints (Figs 1c, 2c and 3c) and the GPS data equations (Figs 1d, 2d and 3d) for varying weights on damping (αd, along y axes), smoothing (αs, along x axes) and ∇×∇v= 0 constraints (γr, subplots 1, 2 and 3). Every contour plot represents 25 inversions.

Sensitivity analysis of inversions of GPS velocity data (Fig. 2) for the velocity gradient field. Results for size[C] (eq. 2, Figs 1a, 2a and 3a), size[S] (eq. 3, Figs 1b, 2b and 3b), the normalized root-mean-square misfit (eq. 4) of the ×v= 0 constraints (Figs 1c, 2c and 3c) and the GPS data equations (Figs 1d, 2d and 3d) for varying weights on damping (αd, along y axes), smoothing (αs, along x axes) and ×v= 0 constraints (γr, subplots 1, 2 and 3). Every contour plot represents 25 inversions.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close