Figure 3
The root mean square error (RMSE) of the CT numbers obtained from scans with titanium (left) or steel (right) inserts, as a function of virtual photon energy level for the central positions 1–4 (top row) and the peripheral positions 5–17 (bottom row) (as defined in Figure 1). The images were acquired with Dual Source (DS) and fast kV-switching (FKS) DECT techniques, and the aforementioned combined by each vendor’s proprietary metal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithm (DS-MAR and FKS-MAR). Corresponding data from images with PMMA inserts are included for comparison.

The root mean square error (RMSE) of the CT numbers obtained from scans with titanium (left) or steel (right) inserts, as a function of virtual photon energy level for the central positions 1–4 (top row) and the peripheral positions 5–17 (bottom row) (as defined in Figure 1). The images were acquired with Dual Source (DS) and fast kV-switching (FKS) DECT techniques, and the aforementioned combined by each vendor’s proprietary metal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithm (DS-MAR and FKS-MAR). Corresponding data from images with PMMA inserts are included for comparison.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close