Figure 2.
Interrelationship between T6P and sugars measured in the different treatments. A, T6P and Suc (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.84, SEE = 0.56, P < 0.011; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.99, SEE = 0.35, P < 0.0001; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.90, SEE = 0.70, P < 0.0041). B, T6P and Glc (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.68, SEE = 0.79, P < 0.045; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.80, SEE = 1.04, P < 0.016; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.94, P < 0.028). C, T6P and Fru (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.72, P < 0.029; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.82, SEE = 1.00, P < 0.013; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.72, SEE = 0.96, P < 0.032). The data are means of three independent samples.

Interrelationship between T6P and sugars measured in the different treatments. A, T6P and Suc (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.84, SEE = 0.56, P < 0.011; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.99, SEE = 0.35, P < 0.0001; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.90, SEE = 0.70, P < 0.0041). B, T6P and Glc (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.68, SEE = 0.79, P < 0.045; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.80, SEE = 1.04, P < 0.016; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.94, P < 0.028). C, T6P and Fru (0.5% [w/v] Suc, solid line, R  2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.72, P < 0.029; 10°C, dashed line, R  2 = 0.82, SEE = 1.00, P < 0.013; No N, dotted line, R  2 = 0.72, SEE = 0.96, P < 0.032). The data are means of three independent samples.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close