Phylogeny derived from the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 data set (a) and the 5.8S data set (b) based on erroneously annotated sequences in the INSD and correct sequences from our research group. A total of 39 ITS entries were identified as wrongly accessioned entries, whereas only 33 or 37 were used to perform phylogenetic analyses due to incomplete sequence for some ITS entries. The three entries marked with black balls were erroneously accessioned but did not form a clade with other entries. The remaining entries were correct sequences of O. sinensis from our research group, and the five “reference sequences” used in this study were marked with black triangles