Figure 6.
Mean value of the cosine of the angle between the orientation of the stars in the central galaxy and the direction of satellite galaxies as a function of the 3D galaxy separation, rescaled by the host halo $r^{\rm crit}_{200}$. The central galaxies used for the left-hand panel are taken from the EAGLE L100 (11.3 < log10(Msub/[h−1 M⊙]) < 12.6) while in the right-hand panel they are taken from the cosmo-OWLS L200 simulation (12.6 < log10(Msub/[h−1 M⊙]) < 13.7). In both panels, the error bars represent 1σ bootstrap errors. Thicker lines indicate higher mass. The satellite distribution is aligned with the central galaxy out to ${\sim } 100r^{\rm crit}_{200}$. For $r< 10r^{\rm crit}_{200}$ the alignment is substantially stronger for higher mass satellites.

Mean value of the cosine of the angle between the orientation of the stars in the central galaxy and the direction of satellite galaxies as a function of the 3D galaxy separation, rescaled by the host halo |$r^{\rm crit}_{200}$|⁠. The central galaxies used for the left-hand panel are taken from the EAGLE L100 (11.3 < log10(Msub/[h−1 M]) < 12.6) while in the right-hand panel they are taken from the cosmo-OWLS L200 simulation (12.6 < log10(Msub/[h−1 M]) < 13.7). In both panels, the error bars represent 1σ bootstrap errors. Thicker lines indicate higher mass. The satellite distribution is aligned with the central galaxy out to |${\sim } 100r^{\rm crit}_{200}$|⁠. For |$r< 10r^{\rm crit}_{200}$| the alignment is substantially stronger for higher mass satellites.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close