Figure 7.
Application of the GS method to protein superfamily data sets obtained from the SCOPe database. Phylogenetic trees of six protein superfamilies were reconstructed using both the GS and NJ$_{{\rm MSA}\_{\rm p}}$ methods. The red branches of the GS and NJ trees are those supported by large EP ($\ge $0.9) and bootstrap ($\ge $0.8) values, respectively. The outer circles represent SCOP concise classification strings (functional classes) according to the color legend on each right side (for description, see Supplementary Table S1 available on Dryad). A number in a dotted box indicates an average sequence similarity score of each superfamily proteins. A number below each tree indicates a ratio of interior branches that are supported.

Application of the GS method to protein superfamily data sets obtained from the SCOPe database. Phylogenetic trees of six protein superfamilies were reconstructed using both the GS and NJ|$_{{\rm MSA}\_{\rm p}}$| methods. The red branches of the GS and NJ trees are those supported by large EP (⁠|$\ge $|0.9) and bootstrap (⁠|$\ge $|0.8) values, respectively. The outer circles represent SCOP concise classification strings (functional classes) according to the color legend on each right side (for description, see Supplementary Table S1 available on Dryad). A number in a dotted box indicates an average sequence similarity score of each superfamily proteins. A number below each tree indicates a ratio of interior branches that are supported.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close